Book review writing service

Before you start to compose your review, you have to comprehend what it is and why students write it at all. Consequently, a review of a book is a statement, which should contain an opinion about the book, which you read, and its evaluation. The review of the book must be emotional and well grounded.

The purpose of the book review is, first of all, to share your own impression about the book, express the thoughts and feelings that you got at the period of reading this book. Also, try to call attention to read this book.

We need a plan!

On the one hand, it is easy to write any free work, when there is no set of frameworks and you have to write only your own thoughts, you have more space for creativity. But there is another side. Such kind of work can be quite confusing. To avoid this, when writing a review it is better to think consistently and use the plan.

Book review plan

Introduction. Here you can tell about your readers’ preferences, share a story about how you got acquainted with this book. Here you have also to give an assessment of the book if you liked it or disliked. Write if it was interested, made an impression, cheered or seemed useful and instructive. In this section, you must write the name of the book and its author.

Consideration. Now it’s time to write more about your assessment and give different arguments. It is better to do it consistently.

How important is the topic raised by the author? Are there any actual issues raised in the work?

Take a brief look at the events which were described in the book. However, you do not need to compose every one of the privileged insights of the book. In the event that you expound on an investigator, you can portray a conclusion, yet regardless you can not indicate that the gunner was a murderer. In this case, you can mark the most important episodes.

Evaluation of the characters, their actions. There is no need to describe all the participants; write only about two or three main characters of the book. Be sure to express your attitude to the heroes and their fates.

Making the report – how to do it right?

It happens that the student brings to the teacher a beautiful, profound, perfectly revealing essay, and the teacher wraps up the work due to improper design. It is especially insulting to receive such a surprise before the very test or examination, which is not allowed without a valid abstract. So the design of the essay – this is not a trifle.

However, there is nothing complicated in the rules of writing an abstract. Problems usually arise in freshmen, who simply do not yet know how to properly prepare the abstract (because they were too lazy to find out before surrendering). But this article will help those who did not take the methodology on the chair and thought about the design the night before the delivery of the work – agree, the prevalent situation!

Sometimes pale with the correct form of the essay happens in novice students and illiterate essay writers. Deciding to earn some money, a beginner student believes that it is enough to write a job, and is very upset when the customer with the scandal needs improvements: the design is not according to the standard. So this article, too, seems useful to the students.

General rules for drawing up abstracts

There are several types of abstracts, but in this case we mean the format of the academic work. This work, which can be called a reduced, simpler version of the course. Therefore, the academic essay is formalized in general in the same way as coursework and diplomas.

In many universities and even more so in schools, the design of abstracts is less rigorous, allowing for small deviations from a strict standard. Some departments have their own rules concerning the design of works, especially the title pages (so, in addition to studying the general rules described below, we recommend still taking the manual on the chair, sometimes special requirements are invented by the instructors precisely to check whether you read this methodology or not?).

But in general, it is enough to comply with the basic rules regarding font selection, putting down footnotes, numbering, filling out the contents, bibliography, title page.

Best of all, if you study the rules for writing an abstract according to standards that meet the standards for the design of more serious research papers, rather than writing essays. Even if a teacher is not of finding fault, redundant, these skills will not. And if you get a “bureaucrat” from our classification of scientific leaders, then the design of the abstract according to the rules will be more important than the content!

This entry was posted in Report.

9 mistakes when writing the introduction of the thesis

When a student brings a teacher the introduction of a diploma, pre-defense usually remains not so much time. But the supervisor sends for revision one, two, three … Many students believe that the introduction is the most difficult part in the structure of the thesis. And teachers shrug their shoulders puzzled: what’s so complicated about the requirements for the introduction? Why do these dunces do the same, the typical mistakes?

Mistake # 1. The structure of administration does not comply with the standard. Remember the main life when writing the introduction to the thesis: the introduction is written according to the template! You do not need to reinvent the wheel. Take the methodology of the department and the diploma of the predecessor (better than an excellent student). Focusing on the template, a sane introduction can even be written by a student.

Mistake # 2. The introduction is completely or partially written off from someone’s monograph. It is now difficult to find a student who would “borrow” the introduction from the found in the network of someone else’s diploma. The risk of burning is 100%. But here from monographs – stole. But in vain.

Well, which of these conclusions? If you really stolen introduction, then from the dissertation! Only take a dissertation in the paid thesis room, so that it was not exposed on the Internet.

Mistake # 3. One of the mandatory elements is forgotten: the hypothesis, the problem, the goal, the tasks, the object, the object … The mistake is not so terrible, because you simply enter the missing element into the introduction and calmly carry the scientific supervisor to the next test. The main thing is, do not write enthusiasm superfluously: not in all specialties, for example, you need to form a hypothesis, and on some object and object do not distinguish. Here we are proceeding to the next error

Mistake # 4. Ignored the methodological instructions of the department. Although the introduction is extremely stereotyped, there are “rattles” at different faculties and even departments. They concern individual elements in the structure of the introduction. Somewhere, a hypothesis is not needed, but a detailed analysis of sources and literature is needed. Somewhere, on the contrary, the works of the predecessors can be mentioned casually, but the hypothesis must necessarily be put forward. In many respects it depends on the type of research, the presence in it or the absence of a practical part. Therefore, do not pester, buy at the chair a manual with a local monastic charter. And teachers a penny, and you have fewer problems.

Mistake # 5. The relevance of the study is not grounded. This error is private, but frequent. That is, she, in general, is in mistake number 3, but is so popular that we decided to take it to a separate point. The problem is solved like this: take the submitted for revision introduction, sit down and start to reflect on the relevance of your diploma. If nothing comes into your head, ask for online service essay writer.

Mistake # 6. The goals and tasks are confused. Another particular claiming for the role of typicality. Well, do not see the students between them a difference! And to some extent this is understandable, because in everyday speech we often synonymize these concepts: the phrase “My goal is to quit smoking” and “The task before me is to quit smoking” is usually perceived as being the same in meaning (although this is not entirely true).


Mistake # 7. The object and the object are confused. Same. Students love them to be confused! Remember: an object is a general field of research, an object is that part of this field that you directly examine (elements, new properties, relations, object functions).

Mistake # 8. Insufficient in-depth analysis of sources and literature. At once we will tell: not on all specialties this analysis is required. But there, where it is required (for example, on the history) – hold on! Several pages, or even a dozen, will have to devote a thoughtful analysis of sources, books and articles on your topic. As practice shows, the introduction due to errors can be sent for revision five and ten times. In order not to suffer, order the introduction or the whole diploma from the student.

Mistake # 9. There is no connection with the main part. Hypothesis was put forward, the goal was determined, the tasks were set, and the soul went to heaven! He flies through pits and potholes, over hummocks and rifts. The tasks, the hypothesis, and even the subject of research have already been forgotten. We were going to write about goats, but we write about rams.

10 mistakes when writing a practical part of the thesis

Will the teacher ever take this malicious chapter? What more does he need? Where are the mistakes? What’s wrong?! Read our new article, collected of our service, and you will understand – what is wrong and what mistakes you made when writing a practical chapter of the thesis.

Mistake # 1. The discrepancy of the theory. The mistake is widespread and difficult to remove, as it is usually necessary to rewrite the entire practice, to reassemble information and perform calculations. Sometimes it is easier to rewrite the theory – if, of course, the topic of the work allows. If you are a philologist, then in the given example, you can leave practice by reworking the theoretical chapter. But it does not always happen.

Mistake # 2. Inconsistency with the introduction. Remember: the practical part is written not then that the reviewer spent a fascinating watch, studying your calculations of the typical trajectories of a sandwich fall. And then, to solve the problem posed in the introduction. For example – reducing unauthorized consumption of oil when sandwiches fall in public catering establishments.

Mistake # 3. Nonconformity with the conclusion. Success in writing a practical chapter in general is very strongly tied to a competent drawing of threads to other parts of the work. The practical chapter too often, unfortunately, is a spherical horse in a vacuum: a diploma somehow by itself, calculations and practical conclusions – by themselves. And the diploma work looks very stupid, in the conclusion of which it is cheerfully reported: the goal is achieved, the tasks are fulfilled, the hypothesis is proved!

Mistake # 4. Inaccuracies in the calculations. Twice two, five? Well done, go and count. It is more insulting if the error has crept into the beginning of calculations. However, we will be frank: many students produce them so that they “come together”. But it does not take place at all faculties.

Mistake # 5. Illiterate registration of calculations, tables, formulas. The main load for competent design – according to GOSTs – falls precisely on a practical chapter, as it abounds with tables and calculations with various graphic elements. And now everything seems to be correctly calculated – and the teacher returns the chapter for revision. And the terrible word “GOST” sounds. Sometimes – the phrase “Look in the manual.” Well, it’s relatively easy to deal with this problem, although it’s a bit of a chore. We recommend reading in advance on online service essay writer an article of how to make out tables according to GOST and how to draw out drawings.

Mistake # 6. Absence of analysis, generalization of practical materials, conclusions. Counted everything correctly, designed – flawlessly. And what? But nothing. The conclusions from this are zero. Well, go ahead, darling, reflect on the calculations done, compare-categorize, analyze and generally use the brain not only as a calculator. If you have calculated, for example, the cost of a two-week tour to Chukotka and to Antarctica – so at least compare that is cheaper.

Mistake # 7. Unreal data. Ohh, you are fired. Perhaps the teacher personally maintains contacts with the organization, where you had to collect material for a practical chapter. But in this organization you have never been seen. Perhaps you were sleeping on some little things: you borrowed data from a graduate from a dairy, changed it slightly, processed … Everything is plausible, except for a trifle: the dairy, an infection, was closed a year ago. Or maybe you are insolent in the land and your “data” turned out to be so graceless that you do not need to be Sherlock Holmes to determine the lag.

Student! Remember! Lying is believable! Otherwise, you are not only that you will receive a chapter for revision, so also you will provide yourself with increased attention of the scientific leader. And the next version of your calculations, the teacher will check under the magnifying glass.

This entry was posted in My Blog.

In whatever business school you go, from writing an essay you do not get away

Now in the West, an unprecedented flourishing is experienced by firms engaged in the professional writing of essays for those entering the business school for money. The reason for this is rather prosaic – current students at Harvard Business School and Stanford Business School quite often say that they spent three months writing an essay. And all because the essay is if not the most important, then at least one of the key points of entering a business school. On importance with him can only be compared with a personal interview. For a Russian person, this is not an easy task, since the standards for writing such written works in the West are completely different.

The essay is “writing on the topic given by the business school.” Accordingly, the main purpose of this text is to disclose the proposed topic by bringing different arguments (theses). They should be supported by evidence, illustrated by examples and generally looked weighty.

This text will judge you as a person – about how smart you are, how well educated you are, how well you know the language, and in general you approach the school. Topics are determined by what information each particular business school considers most important in terms of determining the “professional suitability” of a potential student. The options are different, but most often the topic is formulated simply: “Why did you decide to enter our business school?” (Read: “Why should we accept you?”). We will dwell on it in more detail.

The most important thing in writing an essay is correct positioning. Imagine that entering a business school you choose does not depend on your real achievements in the field of science and business. At least for a minute imagine that a representative of the selection committee, opening a folder with your documents, would find out only your essay there, and the decision on enrollment would depend on these several pages.

Presented? Then you understand that to write an essay should be approached as closely as possible and with a full sense of responsibility. Starting work on the essay, no matter how trivial it is to note, you should carefully read the task. One of the most common mistakes that many failed students make is the misinterpretation of the assigned task (question) or the lack of response to it and the departure from the given topic. A widely known example is the interpretation of one of the former themes of the Chicago School of Business essay. It was formulated as follows: Vacation of Your Lifetime. Obviously, with inattentive reading, this topic is often treated as a vacation for life, although in fact she asks to answer the question of the best (most memorable) leave in her entire life.

Before you start writing your creation, sit down and, after thinking hard, sketch a small plan. For this, it is not bad to have information about what the representatives of the admissions committee of a particular school want from you, what students they prefer to see within their walls. Think also about what details of your experience you should mention and what strengths of character to illuminate. You should pay special attention to what you can counter to your competitors. If the assignment of an essay requires you to describe your strengths, you do not need to write about your punctuality and diligence, since hardly anyone will write that he is lazy and always late. Instead of being another lucky financial analyst, it’s better to imagine yourself a financial analyst who in his spare time voluntarily works in a shelter for stray dogs. After all, one of the main tasks of a business school is to provide a student body diversity, that is, the diversity of students. Therefore, your experience of participating in a polar expedition or launching a new project will cause much greater interest than a description of the glorious successes in the field of consulting.

The content of the essay itself should have links in three areas: your work activity, especially the career, your personal qualities and the transfer of special programs and courses, to which you will make a special emphasis while studying at a business school. Do not neglect self-analysis. Usually the desired volume of the essay (in pages or number of words) is clearly stipulated in the information booklet. God forbid you go beyond this framework by more than 15-20%. Do not think that if you write more, it will be given to you for credit. The business school wants to make sure that you not only know how to formulate your thoughts in a harmonious way, but you also do it laconically. In this case, the volume of the essay can range from 100 (one of the essays in Harvard) to 2500 words – about 5-6 pages (Stanford and Wharton). Working on the essay, decide what exactly you want to say and how much space in your work you are going to give each position. Remember that the entry should never take up more space than the main part.

This entry was posted in Essay.